There’s No Need for Medical Expert in Malpractice Case

by | Sep 12, 2013 | Firm News, Medical Malpractice |

It is very rare for a court in Ohio to allow a medical malpractice lawsuit
to go to trial without the victim showing that a medical expert has reviewed
the case. This is, in part, because it is the victim’s duty to show
that there was negligent medical treatment or a surgical mistake, which
is most often shown by an assertion that what the physician did was outside
the professional standard of care. Who best to review that but a medical expert?

In a recent out-of-state medical malpractice case, however, a woman relied
on the doctrine of “res ipsa loquitur,” which says that if
an injury could only have happened because of negligence, it becomes the
defendant’s burden to prove that there was no negligence. The appeals
court in this case found that res ipsa loquitur applied when a woman started
secreting feces from her vagina following a surgery on her intestines.

The woman had undergone surgery on her small intestines and surgeons were
going to remove a portion and then reattach the remaining intestines to
her rectum with a surgical stapler. Instead, they accidentally stapled
her intestine to her vagina. Fortunately, the error was discovered the
following day, but the follow-up surgery left her with conversion disorder.
She was unable to completely control her hand movement, she was weak on
the left side of her body, and developed poor vision and speech.

Res ipsa loquitur does not always apply, but if there is no good explanation
for an injury, a medical malpractice lawyer may be able to help bring
a lawsuit under this important doctrine.


  • Super Lawyers
  • Best Law Firms 2020
  • Best Lawyers 2020
  • Best Lawyers 2021
  • best law firms award
  • american association for justice
  • $350 million awarded
  • amerian institute of legal counsel
  • top rated lawyers