Federally Funded NY Clinic Faces Medical Malpractice Suit

by | Feb 10, 2017 | Birth Injury, Firm News, Medical Malpractice |


A federally funded New York health clinic and its doctors were hit with
a medical malpractice suit in federal court on Monday, alleging that a
diabetes-stricken woman delivered a stillborn baby because medical staff
ignored her pre-existing condition and didn’t order a cesarean section in time.

Plaintiff Christine Perez sued the U.S. government after, she says, the
federally funded Hudson River Healthcare in Yonkers and three of its doctors
improperly managed her diabetes condition during her pregnancy, including
missing symptoms and complaints indicating a likely danger to her fetus
and ultimately leading to the death of her baby last January at 38 weeks.

Hudson had a duty of care, the suit says, to take heed of signs such as
abnormal lab results that showed Perez’s diabetes was poorly controlled
while she was pregnant, the suit says, adding that the hospital and its
staff’s failure to do so was negligent and “in deviation from
the accepted standards of medical care applicable to a physician and medical
facility with the same specialty and training.

“As a result of that aforesaid negligence and medical malpractice,
[Perez] sustained severe personal injuries, and has suffered great pain,
agony, injury, suffering, mental anguish, emotional distress, psychiatric
injury and medical expenses,” the suit says.

According to the complaint, Perez, who had diabetes before she became pregnant,
informed her doctors and nurses at Hudson of that fact when she started
prenatal care at the clinic, which then represented its staff as fully
qualified to safely diagnose, treat and manage such a condition over the
duration of her pregnancy.

As such, the suit claims, Hudson owed a duty of care to put qualified and
experienced physicians on the job, or refer the patient to specialists
when it became clear her blood sugars were abnormal.

Instead, Perez’s prenatal care was “performed negligently,
carelessly, recklessly and […] not in accord with good and accepted
standards of care,” the suit says.

The complaint continues, saying “Hudson had a duty to provide Perez
and her unborn child with safe, competent, careful, skilled, accurate,
appropriate, necessary and proper diagnostic care, prenatal care, diabetes
management and medical care,” adding that the clinic should have
known that “the medical personnel rendering care and services to
[Perez] … did not possess the requisite skill, knowledge, experience
or learning required to safely perform or render the medical care, prenatal
care and treatment to Perez.”

Counsel information for the government was not immediately available on Monday.

The case is Perez v. U.S., case number
1:17-cv-00692, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York.

Medical malpractice occurs when a doctor fails to provide proper care to
a patient, often resulting in serious injury or even death. If you or
a loved one has been hurt by medical errors and/or medical malpractice,
contact the experienced attorneys at The Lancione Law Firm or call us
at 440-331-6100.

This article is brought to you by The Lancione Law Firm.

The article is written by:Kat Sieniuc, as seen on www.law360.com




  • Super Lawyers
  • Best Law Firms 2020
  • Best Lawyers 2020
  • Best Lawyers 2021
  • best law firms award
  • american association for justice
  • $350 million awarded
  • amerian institute of legal counsel
  • top rated lawyers